raging_swan (raging_swan) wrote,
raging_swan
raging_swan

Shadowed Keep on the Borderlands: Design Thoughts IV

Shadowed Keep on the Borderlands

Last week, I talked a little bit about the initial concepts of the Shadowed Keep’s various "adventure zones.”  Coming up with the basic themes for each area was relatively simple. What was a bit tricky was designing a backstory that both made sense and that the PCs would be able to discover during the course of the adventure.

One of my bugbears about some adventures I’ve run is that the adventure (or sometimes even a specific encounter) will have loads of cool backstory, but that essentially there is no way for the PCs to discover that story. Sure, it’s a great read for the GM, but essentially it’s just wasted space in the module, and can even lead to player frustration as they have no idea why the NPC was acting that way, why the monsters were there (or whatever). To me, a module which forces the GM to say “don’t worry, it all makes sense” to the players has failed to create an engaging and believable experience. That’s not to say a module shouldn’t have mysteries within, but that by the end of the module the PCs should have a decent chance to discover what was actually going on!

One of my key goals for the Shadowed Keep was that the ruin should/could act as a potential springboard for further adventures. One of my ideas for the keep to continue to focus in the campaign was that eventually, perhaps, the PCs could return when they had grown in power and claim the place as their own, repairing it and using it as a  base to subdue the surrounding territory. I thought a cool way of implanting the idea in the players’ heads would be to have the keep the home of a semi-retired adventurer and (as it turned out later) his family.

Sadly for that adventurer (Valentin Ironwolf), of course, there had to be a reason for the PCs to explore the ruin and thus his demise was assured. Conflict is at the heart of any good story and luckily the keep stands in a borderland area and thus it was logical to assume that Valentin had failed in his quest to establish a safe home for his family. Having decided that one of the adventure zones would be inhabited by goblins, it seemed obvious to determine that the tribe was responsible (at least in part) for the keep’s fall. Thus, when the PCs eventually defeated the goblins they would be revenging the fallen Valentin. The goblins lurked under the keep leaving the upper levels to fall into ruin – hence why monstrous creatures lurked in the donjon and why bandits eventually took over the watchtower.

The presence of the bandits also enabled me to add conflict into the current-day keep. Neither the goblins or the bandits would be happy with the presence of the other and so the two groups would be fighting over the keep when the PCs arrive. Clever PCs could discern this rivalry and possibly even use it to their own advantage.

Explaining the presence of the undead and constructs in zone 4 would be trickier. I wanted to include such a zone for PC clerics and paladins to show off their specialised abilities, but having such a locale under the keep of a retired adventurer required an extra element of the background. Of course, not all the elements of the background needed to flow from the adventurer and his family. So I decided that Valentin built a crypt to house his fallen retainers and that a later influence corrupted their remains. I also decided that this level should be free of goblin taint, so that it offered a completely different game experience. Thus, I decided that a minor earthquake struck the area after Valentin’s fall opening up a link to a deeply buried corruption.

Of course, the challenge of the module’s design was to enable the PCs to discover as much of this background as possible. In Pathfinder, of course, PCs can make knowledge checks to learn more about their environment – I just had to nudge them to make those checks. I was relatively certain that any halfway competent group would try and learn as much about the keep as possible before setting out (and provided tables to handle that) but I also scattered “calls to learn” throughout the keep – tapestries, carvings, remnants of the keep’s former occupants and a ghost who could provide much of the backstory. In the lower level (zone 4) the very condition of the dungeon – cracked and damaged walls, sagging ceilings and damaged columns all hinted at some movement of the earth. The chill temperature – that got colder as one approached the closest part of the dungeon to the corruption below – also highlighted the reasons for the undead being present (and possibly provided an avenue for future adventure).

Of course, it was not my intention to beat the players over the head with my Background Stick. At the end of the day, some gamers play just to hit stuff and the adventure had support that style of play. Including major encounters in which success hinged on knowing some key facet of the background were thus off the table – however, I knew that rewarding players who were paying attention to the various “calls to learn” was a Good Thing.

At the end of the day, the backstory is the spine of an adventure – everything should hang off it and everything should hang together to make a coherent, logical and believable adventure. If the backstory is illogical, baffling or indecipherable, the adventure itself would be a disaster.

Next time, in my last instalment before the Shadowed Keep on the Borderland releases, I’ll talk a bit about other facets of the design philosophy that drove my adventure zone and encounter design.

Tags: game design, pathfinder, shadowed keep on the borderlands
Subscribe
  • Post a new comment

    Error

    default userpic

    Your reply will be screened

    Your IP address will be recorded 

    When you submit the form an invisible reCAPTCHA check will be performed.
    You must follow the Privacy Policy and Google Terms of use.
  • 5 comments